Bureaucracy U: How much red tabe is too much?
Todd Toner
Issue date: 10/18/06 Section: Opinion
- Page 1 of 1
|
What credentials must an individual have in order to qualify to handle and manage the extremely sensitive computer equipment in our office? If this equipment is so susceptible to breakage that only qualified individuals can manage and care for it, then why are we even allowed to use this equipment? It seems to me that if the establishment truly wanted to protect their investments against abuse and misuse, then they would impose a managed system where an individual couldn't even use a device without the direct supervision of an authorized controller.
Aren't we just moving up a rung on the ladder toward Big Brother's absolute control and imposition? It's time to reevaluate the mentality that is gradually confining our abilities to function. The more we limit the abilities of the individual in society, the more we foster the attitude that micromanaging and henpecking is standard operating procedure.
I've been on both ends of this spectrum. I've fixed the broken equipment of novice users and felt the pain of PEBKAC (Problems Exist Between Keyboard And Chair) incompetence. Yet there is no justifiable reason why exceptions to the rules can't be given when an individual shows the aptitude necessary to fulfill the requirements established by the powers that be. It's time to unchain our hands and acknowledge that not everyone in this system is woefully ridiculous.
2008 Woodie Awards
Be the first to comment on this story